MODELLING OF THE MECHANISMS OF MANIPULATION OF MASS CONSCIOUSNESS IN AUDIOVISUAL ART ON THE BASIS OF THE ANALISIS OF D. HANSEL'S FILM "EXPERIMENT 2: WAVE"
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
In a number of cases, external sources of invasive penetration into the surrounding world of a person found in the world. The problem of manipulation of human consciousness through the media, imposed ideas by opinion leaders is growing every year. A person and society are completely unaware of the extent of the invasion of their privacy. Historically, the methods of manipulation are changing from more direct and explicit to unobtrusive and hidden. This is the difficulty of recognizing methods of influencing a person. The article examines how the problem of manipulation of people's mass consciousness by means of audiovisual arts is investigated in art cinema, in particular, how the mechanisms of manipulation of people's mass consciousness are modeled in the 2008 feature film by German director D. Hansel "Experiment 2: Wave". The present study presents an analysis of possible tools and methods of influencing the personality demonstrated in film production, problems arising during the implementation of such practices and possible consequences for society and the individual. The analysis of the film uses an ideological approach in cinema, the author of which was Andre Bazin. This approach is used to study films within the framework of ideology and the attitude of interest to it. With the help of this analytical method, the most representative topics about mass manipulation are identified in D. Hansel's film production. These include description, analysis, synthesis, analogy, interpretation. As a result of the research, several main levels of influence presented by the director are highlighted: family, culture, sports, education, the criminal world. At the final stage of the research, has been carried out analysis of the methods presented by D. Hansel in his film production and the generally recognized means of manipulation studied and presented in the works of sociologists and philosophers (E. Fromm, G. Marcuse, P. Kara-Murza, etc.).

Keywords:
"Experiment 2: Wave", manipulation, mass consciousness, management tools, model of society
References

1. Alekseeva, M. V. (2022). Features of the subject and content of spiritual and moral education as a measure of the formation of the information space of knowledge. Siberian Anthropological Journal, 6, 4, 74-80. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2542-1816-2022-6-4-74-80

2. Ashin, G.K. (1971). The doctrine of "mass society". Moscow: Politizdat, 191.

3. Badyu, A. (2013). The mysterious relation of philosophy and politics. Moscow: Institute of General Humanitarian Research, 112.

4. Bazin, A. (2012). About the policy of the authors [Electronic resource]. Cineticle. Online magazine about the author's cinema. URL: https://cineticle.com/de-la-politique-des-auteurs/

5. Bazin, A. (1972). What is cinema? Moscow: Art, 382.

6. Bauer, G. V. (2022). Review of N. Yastikli's article "Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning" (Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2007. 8 (4)). Digitalization, 3, 4, 44-51. doihttps://doi.org/10.37993/2712-8733-2022-3-4-44-51. EDN: OUOZNV

7. Belozerova, Yu. (2005). The Feeling of Nazism: an interview with Dennis Hansel of non-giftedness [Electronic resource]. Newropeans magazine. URL http://www.newropeans-magazine.org/en/2005/02/03/feeling-nazism-interview-with-dennis-gansel/

8. Baudrillard, J. (2000). In the shadow of the silent majority, or the End of the social. Yekaterinburg: Ural Publishing House. University, 96.

9. Vasilenko I.V., Pershin, N.I. (2000). Features of mass political consciousness. Problems of social and humanitarian knowledge, 196-201.

10. Vizgalova E. (2008). "Experiment 2: Wave" [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/art/artkino/968 /

11. Vilchinskaya L.Z. (2013). Mass consciousness in the philosophy of E. Fromm. Proceedings of the Moscow State Technical University MAMI, 4 (18), 12-19.

12. Volokhova E.P. (2008). The phenomenon of mass consciousness. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University, 2, 80-90.

13. Gulyaev R. (2016). What to watch: "Experiment 2: Wave" [Electronic resource]. Postnauka. URL: https://postnauka.ru/faq/5873

14. Jowett G., O'Donnell V. (2007). Propaganda and suggestion. Advertising: suggestion and manipulation. Samara: BAKHRAH-M, 746.

15. Dobroslavsky A. (2015). The film "Experiment 2: Wave": A choice of two evils. [Electronic resource]. Teach the good. URL: https://whatisgood.ru/tv/films/film-eksperiment-2-volna-vybor-iz-dvux-zol/

16. Evgrafova Yu.A. (2018). Sign as a means of constructing reality and manipulating consciousness in semiotically complicated screen texts (on the example of cinema and television texts. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University, 3, 240-255.

17. Ermakov T. K., Omelik A. A. (2022) Analysis of some trends in the history of generative art. Sociology of Artificial Intelligence, 3, 4, 61-81. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-61-81. EDN: JYTAQX

18. Zhemchugova O.A. (2014). Tools for manipulating mass consciousness on the example of the cinema of the USA. Bulletin of MGIMO University, 267-270.

19. Zhigaeva A. A. (2022). Digest of news in the field of artificial intelligence development. Sociology of artificial intelligence, 3, 4, 34-40. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-34-40. EDN: EBWHLO

20. Zhigaeva A. A., Zhigaev I. G. (2022) Classification of intertextual connections of works of fine art relative to the statuses of the artistic image. Northern archives and expeditions, 6, 2, 182-189. doi:https://doi.org/10.31806/2542-1158-2022-6-2-182-189.

21. Ignatenko S. A., Shaposhnikova G. A., Sorokina A. E. (2022). Alternative history as a postmodern phenomenon. Sociology of Artificial Intelligence, 3, 4, 150-160. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-150-160. EDN: VATCZI

22. Ishutina E. N., Kuznetsova A. A., Anishchenko S. A. (2022). Review of the book by Benjamin Hora, Win Win Chorus, Sean Paul Lee, Dillon Yap, Chin and Hong Hongchin "How to NFT". Sociology of Artificial intelligence, 3, 4, 142-149. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-142-149. EDN: UMNNJM

23. Kara-Murza S.G. (2021). Manipulation of consciousness. Moscow: Rodina, 432.

24. Kataev Z. M. (2022). Idealization in the work of Lars von Trier. Siberian Anthropological Journal, 3 (9), 18-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.31804/2542-1816-2022-6-3-18-27.

25. Kataev Z. M. (2022). The main ideas of the philosophy of culture in psychoanalysis Z. Freud. Siberian Anthropological Journal, 3 (9), 28-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.31804/2542-1816-2022-6-3-28-35.

26. Kirko V. I. (2022). Review of the book "Artificial intelligence and its shortcomings. Criticism of Social and humanitarian Sciences" (Springer, 2022). Sociology of Artificial Intelligence, 3, 4, 23-33. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-23-33. EDN: CSCPDX

27. Kozlov E. S., Yurchenko P. A. (2022). Clones and artificial intelligence in cinematographic art in the period from 1977 to 2020. Sociology of artificial intelligence, 3, 4, 95-105. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-95-105. EDN: KQHLEG

28. Koptseva N. P. (2022). Review of the book "Enchanting Robots. Intimacy, Magic, and Technology", by M. Musyal (Springer, 2019). Digitalization, 3, 4, 52-64. doihttps://doi.org/10.37993/2712-8733-2022-3-4-52-64. EDN: KPCVTD

29. Koptseva N. P. (2022). Modern research in the field of sociology of artificial intelligence: basic approaches. Part 5. Sociology of artificial intelligence, 3, 4, 9-22. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-9-22. EDN: AAVWZ

30. Kornev V.V. (2014). Ordinary ideology (to the half-century anniversary of "Ordinary fascism" by M. Romm). Labyrinth. Journal of Social and Humanitarian Studies, 4, 66-70.

31. Kupriyanova A. A., Lutsyk D. N. (2022). Digest of news in the field of artificial intelligence development. Sociology of artificial intelligence, 3, 4, 41-52. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-41-52. EDN: FXLJUC

32. Lebon G. (2015). Psychology of peoples and masses. Moscow: Academic Project, 239.

33. Leychenko N. M. (2022). Analytical review of domestic practices of the use of neural network and innovative technologies in the field of art. Digitalization, 3, 4, 8-19. doihttps://doi.org/10.37993/2712-8733-2022-3-4-8-19. EDN: SSRQHA

34. Lipsky V.N. (2016). Aesthetic attitude to mass consciousness and mass culture. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 3, 258-264.

35. Luzhansky S. V. (2022). Basic concepts of the theory of intertextuality. Siberian Anthropological Journal, 3 (9), 36-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.31804/2542-1816-2022-6-3-36-44.

36. Makarchuk I. Y. (2022). Interpretation of journalistic works in humanitarian studies (on the example of M. Gorky, A.N. Tolstoy and M.A. Sholokhov). Siberian Anthropological Journal, 3 (9), 45-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.31804/2542-1816-2022-6-3-45-55.

37. Margolina E.L., Ryumshina L.I. (1999). Manipulation as a psychological phenomenon. Applied Psychology, 4, 65-74.

38. Marcuse G. (2011). Critical Theory of Society: selected works on philosophy and social criticism. Moscow: AST: Astrel, 382.

39. Melkonyan K.Yu. (2010). Cinematography as a factor in the formation of the socio-cultural space of modern society. Bulletin of Stavropol State University, 66, 259-263.

40. Mikhailova M. (2020). Goebbels' tricks: "Experiment 2: Wave" [Electronic resource]. Kinopank. URL https://kino-punk.ru/review/diewelle/index.html

41. Moisa O. (2015). Every herd is a refuge of non-giftedness [Electronic resource]. Ramtograph. URL http://www.ramtograf.ru/t-kinopokaz-volna-05-15.html

42. Mureiko L.V. (2011). The temporality of mass consciousness. Scientific and Technical vedomosti SPbGPU, 3, 230-236.

43. Nikiforova I.G. (2018). Scenarios of the school educational discourse of the Third Reich (based on the material of German-language feature films). Political Linguistics, 119-123.

44. Olkhovaya T.A., Myasnikova T.I. (2013). Development of value-semantic attitude of students to the media space: analysis of educational experience. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Philology. Art history, 22 (313), 73-81.

45. Omelik A. A., Kvashnina Yu. V. (2022). A detailed review of the collective monograph "Philosophical problems of artificial intelligence development". Sociology of artificial intelligence, 3, 4, 129-141. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-129-141. EDN: TIIAMI

46. Pashova E. V. (2022). Psychological features of ecological consciousness and ecological behavior: a review of world and Russian studies. Northern archives and expeditions, 6, 1, 112-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.31806/2542-1158-2022-6-1-112-121.

47. Pikov N. O. (2022). In The conceptual foundations of modern research of cultural heritage. Northern archives and expeditions, 6, 1, 65-77. doi:https://doi.org/10.31806/2542-1158-2022-6-1-65-77

48. Puyu Yu.V. (2010). Anthropology of manipulation / Yu.V. Puyu // Bulletin of the A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 2, 61-67.

49. Seredkina N. N. (2022). Transformation of ethnic identity: conceptual analysis. Northern archives and expeditions, 6, 4, 53-62. doi:https://doi.org/10.31806/2542-1158-2022-6-4-53

50. Simonova Yu. G., Redko O. Yu. (2022). Disney villains in the films of the XXI century (survey results). Sociology of artificial intelligence, 3, 4, 117-128. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-117-128. EDN: QSPOFI

51. Sitnikova A. A., Li S. (2022). The image of China in the work of Krasnoyarsk artist Sergei Forostovsky. Northern archives and expeditions, 6, 4, 87-98. doi:https://doi.org/10.31806/2542-1158-2022-6-4-87-98

52. Skrobotova Ya. A., Samoryadova Ya. I. (2022). Review of the exhibition of Japanese photography "SAMURAI FOTO. Masters of the Japanese landscape" in the museum "Peace Square" in Krasnoyarsk . Sociology of Artificial Intelligence, 3, 4, 82-94. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-82-94. EDN: KIIHEL

53. Smetanina M. D. (2022). On the question of Siberian identity. Siberian Anthropological Journal, 6, 4, 48-53. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2542-1816-2022-6-4-48-53.

54. Sobol O. A. (2022). Traditional visual art in the era of digitalization. Digitalization, 3, 4, 20-31. doihttps://doi.org/10.37993/2712-8733-2022-3-4-20-31. EDN: GEJKSO

55. Freud Z. (1926). Psychology of the masses and the analysis of the "I". Moscow: Modern problems, 42.

56. Fromm E. (1988). Anatomy of human destructiveness. Moscow: AST, 672.

57. Fromm E. (1990). Flight from freedom. Moscow: Progress, 269.

58. House M. (2012). Experiment 2: Wave (Die Welle) [Electronic resource]. Kinotom. A movie blog with a character. URL http://kinotom.com/recenziya-na-film-eksperiment2-volna-diewelle.html

59. Khusnullina R. E. (2022). Modern Japanese photography in the museum center "Peace Square" in Krasnoyarsk: the role of sound in the museum exhibition. Digitalization, 3, 4, 32-43. doihttps://doi.org/10.37993/2712-8733-2022-3-4-32-43. EDN: NITMQH

60. Khusnullina R. E., Baklanov Yu. A. (2022). Adaptation of the image of Joan of Arc in modern digital art. Sociology of artificial intelligence, 3, 4, 106-116. doihttps://doi.org/10.31804/2712-939X-2022-3-4-106-116. EDN: QRWNXW

61. Sheinov V.P. (2014). Manipulation and protection from manipulation. St. Petersburg: Peter, 162.

62. Shmigelskaya A. P. (2022). The main stages of formation of the Krasnoyarsk writers' organization. Northern archives and expeditions, 6, 4, 131-143. doi:https://doi.org/10.31806/2542-1158-2022-6-4-131-143

63. Shpak A. A. (2022). Complex ethnic identities: the study of the phenomenon in modern humanitarian knowledge. Northern archives and expeditions, 6, 1, 10-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.31806/2542-1158-2022-6-1-10-16.

64. Eisenstein S. M. (1956). Selected articles. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 456.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?